A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (2nd

Author note: Robert E. Goodin (Editor), Philip Pettit (Editor)

This re-creation of A significant other to modern Political Philosophy has been prolonged considerably to incorporate fifty five chapters throughout volumes written by way of a few of today's such a lot amazing scholars.

• New participants contain a few of today's so much amazing students, between them Thomas Pogge, Charles Beitz, and Michael Doyle
• offers in-depth insurance of latest philosophical debate in all significant similar disciplines, similar to economics, heritage, legislations, political technology, diplomacy and sociology
• provides research of key political ideologies, together with new chapters on Cosmopolitanism and Fundamentalism

Includes particular discussions of significant ideas in political philosophy, together with advantage, energy, human rights, and simply battle

Show description

Read Online or Download A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (2nd Edition) PDF

Similar political philosophy books

Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory

Inventing the industry: Smith, Hegel, and Political concept analyses the buildings of the industry within the considered Adam Smith and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and discusses their relevance for modern political philosophy. Combining the background of principles with systematic research, it contrasts Smith's view of the marketplace as a benevolently designed 'contrivance of nature' with Hegel's view of the industry as a 'relic of the nation of nature.

Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays (SUNY Series in Political Theory: Contemporary Issues)

This paintings offers either the variety of Arendt's political suggestion and the styles of controversy it has elicited. The essays are prepared in six elements round very important subject matters in Arendt's paintings: totalitarianism and evil; narrative and heritage; the general public global and private id; motion and tool; justice, equality, and democracy; and pondering and judging.

Law and Disagreement

While humans disagree approximately justice and approximately person rights, how should still political judgements be made between them? How may still they make a decision approximately concerns like tax coverage, welfare provision, felony approach, discrimination legislation, hate speech, pornography, political dissent and the bounds of non secular toleration?

Law and the Philosophy of Privacy

Situating privateness in the context of political philosophy, this e-book highlights the best way struggles in regards to the that means of privateness have regularly been political. various conceptions of privateness are right here proven to contain various assumptions approximately ontology: our conceptions of self, tradition, society and communique.

Additional info for A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (2nd Edition)

Example text

Feminist and communitarian challenges allege that Rawlsian theory, and any theory in its general image, is sociologically uninformed and, consequently, that its prescriptions are infeasible; they may do for the ciphers conjured up in the philosophical armchair but they will not work for ordinary, culturally situated human beings. Such approaches would lead us away from how analytical philosophers do political philosophy and into the richer pastures seeded by this or that sociological theory. Analytical philosophers have not been hugely disturbed, it must be said, by these attacks.

190). 26 analytical philosophy The long tradition of philosophy from Aristotle had stressed that human beings are essentially social animals but holism only became a prominent philosophical doctrine as a reaction to atomism, among seventeenth- and eighteenth-century forerunners of German romanticism like Vico and Rousseau and Herder (Berlin, 1976). These were all thinkers who were familiar with the atomistic vision of individuals and society and they self-consciously emphasized a thesis that challenged such atomism.

It bears on how far people’s autonomy is compromised from above by aggregate social forces and regularities: individualists deny that there is any compromise whereas collectivists say that human beings are controlled or constrained in a way that diminishes their agency. Atomists and holists may agree that people are more or less autonomous subjects – that they conform to the image that we project in our ordinary psychological thinking about one another – while arguing about the extent to which their capacities as human subjects require social relations.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.57 of 5 – based on 15 votes